Word of the Day: Aporia

a·po·ri·a noun

1. Rhetoric, placing a claim in doubt by developing arguments on both sides of an issue. In the terminology of deconstruction, aporia is a final impasse or paradox–the site at which the text most obviously undermines its own rhetorical structure, dismantles, or deconstructs itself.
2. Logic, Philosophy . a difficulty encountered in establishing the theoretical truth of a proposition, created by the presence of evidence both for and against it. A figure of speech in which the speaker expresses real or simulated doubt or perplexity about where to begin or what to do or say.

 

Etymology: The separation of aporia into its two morphemes a- and poros (‘without’ and ‘passage’) reveals the word’s rich etymological background as well as its connection to Platonic mythology ….. the myth of Poros, Penia, and Eros in Plato’s Symposium especially reveals the concept’s untranslatability. Penia, the “child of poverty,” decides to forcefully impregnate herself with the inebriated Poros, the personification of plenty, who is always in opposition with aporia and thus defining aporia. The result of this union is Eros, who inherits the disparate characteristics of his parents (25). The perplexing aspect of the myth is revealed as one realizes that Penia is acting out of resourcefulness, a quality normally attributed to Poros, and Poros’ inaction reveals his own passivity, a poverty of agency or poros. Such a relationship intensely affects not only the context of aporia but its meaning as well.
:: via The Wikipedia ::

The word is from a recent NYTimes op-ed from a NY state supreme court judge asking for the legalization of MJ.  It’s the same article we’ve seen before but notable for the characters involved and the general eloquence.  The real question, of course, is when will we finally legalize smoking scorpion tail?!?!?

 

Posted in Nubs Up, Word of the Day | Leave a comment

Quote of the Day: Alain

Nothing is erotic which isn’t also, with the wrong person, deeply revolting.

- @Alain De Botton

Hey hey hey, calm down.  It’s just a joke.  Do you even know who emily dickinson is?

Posted in Great Moments in Dating, Nubs Up | Leave a comment

Doomsday Datapoints

It’s not even lunchtime and we’ve listened to presentations by Craig Venter on his plans to create biofuels made by microalgae: an acre, he believes, will be able to produce 10,000 litres of oil per year, as opposed to corn, which can produce just 18. He’s just received $300m of investment from Exxon to make it a reality.

I’m amazed by how many of my friends think that the world is rapidly coming to an end.  Granted, our progress thus far isn’t workable but as a species we’re getting it figured out.

:: Great Article on Singularity University via Email (Thanks Lana!) ::

It’s worth noting that this article is a tad starstruck and isn’t quite as critical as it should be of Mr. Kurzweil.  Also, I think that asteroid mining, while exceptionally cool, is a sexy vanity project for nerdy billionaires.  If the goal is resources the answer is the ocean.  It’s much easier to visit and we have barely even touched on the resources available there.  Except fish, we’ve really fucked that scene up.  Sorry dolphins!

++ Update ++

I forwarded this quote to my friend and she replied:
I visited a guy who is working on it at UC San Diego. He said that basically when humans were evolving agriculture we spent 10,000 years breeding wheat from a random grass to the fat stalks we have today, something capable of becoming a staple crop and supporting huge populations, cities, kings, armies, and all that civilization stuff.
Now we have to perform that same genetic engineering feat with generations of algae to get the stuff that will grow petroleum. WE have far more powerful tools to do it like supercomputers. But we only have like 10 years.

here is a crazy picture of a starfish

Posted in Email Filter, Nubs Up, The Wonders of Science, Tricknology | 1 Comment

Anti-Quote of the Day: Buddhism

“Buddhism is a philosophy, not a religion.”

 1. Buddhists worship a central figure with godlike powers, The Buddha.

2. The whole practice is based around how to transcend the near infinite cycle of spiritual reincarnation.

3. Buddhist monks spend all day praying.

How could anyone even casually familiar w Buddhism say it wasn’t a religion?  100% of the time people who say this do not actually know the difference between philosophy and religion.  Here’s a quick guide:

Is religion just a type of philosophy? Is philosophy a religious activity? There seems to be some confusion at times over just whether and how religion and philosophy should be distinguished from each other — this confusion is not unjustified because there are some very strong similarities between the two.

The questions discussed in both religion and philosophy tend to be very much alike. Both religion and philosophy wrestle with problems like: What is good? What does it mean to live a good life? What is the nature of reality? Why are we here and what should we be doing? How should we treat each other? What is really most important in life?

Clearly, then, there are enough similarities that religions can be philosophical (but need not be) and philosophies can be religious (but again need not be). Does this mean that we simply have two different words for the same fundamental concept? No; there are some real differences between religion and philosophy which warrant considering them to be two different types of systems even though they overlap in places.

To begin with, of the two only religions have rituals. In religions, there are ceremonies for important life events (birth, death, marriage, etc.) and for important times of the year (days commemorating spring, harvest, etc.). Philosophies, however, do not have their adherents engage in ritualistic actions. Students do not have to ritually wash their hands before studying Hegel and professors do not celebrate a “Utilitarian Day” every year.

Another difference is the fact that philosophy tends to emphasize just the use of reason and critical thinking whereas religions may make use of reason, but at the very least they also rely on faith, or even use faith to the exclusion of reason. Granted, there are any number of philosophers who have argued that reason alone cannot discover truth or who have tried to describe the limitations of reason in some manner — but that isn’t the quite the same thing.

You won’t find Hegel, Kant or Russell saying that their philosophies are revelations from a god or that their work should be taken on faith. Instead, they base their philosophies on rational arguments — those arguments may not also prove valid or successful, but it is the effort which differentiates their work from religion. In religion, and even in religious philosophy, reasoned arguments are ultimately traced back to some basic faith in God, gods, or religious principles which have been discovered in some revelation.

A separation between the sacred and the profane is something else lacking in philosophy. Certainly philosophers discuss the phenomena of religious awe, feelings of mystery, and the importance of sacred objects, but that is very different from having feelings of awe and mystery around such objects within philosophy. Many religions teach adherents to revere sacred scriptures, but no one teaches students to revere the collected notes of William James.

Finally, most religions tend to include some sort of belief in what can only be described as the “miraculous” — events which either defy normal explanation or which are, in principal, outside the boundaries of what should occur in our universe. Miracles may not play a very large role in every religion, but they are a common feature which you don’t find in philosophy. Nietzsche wasn’t born of a virgin, no angels appeared to announce the conception of Sartre, and Hume didn’t make the lame walk again.

The fact that religion and philosophy are distinct does not mean that they are entirely separate. Because they both address many of the same issues, it isn’t uncommon for a person to be engaged in both religion and philosophy simultaneously. They may refer to their activity with only one term and their choice of which term to use may reveal quite a lot about their individual perspective on life; nevertheless, it is important to keep their distinctness in mind when considering them.

:: THANK YOU Austin Cline ::

Posted in Duh, Quick Thoughts, Quote of the Day, Seriously! | Leave a comment

Quote of the Day: DK

I have the same conversation, day in and day out, with so many of my best friends. Here is my answer every time: Hon, you deserve to be respected and treated better. Stand up for yourself! There it is, I have made myself irrelevant.

Posted in Quote of the Day | Leave a comment

Quick Thoughts: Today’s News Cycle

Probably about once a month I hear someone say that racism isn’t a problem anymore.  Interestingly, those people are always white and typically fucking idiots.  I don’t follow sports-ball but this is about a compelling counterpoint as you can ask for:

http://www.buzzfeed.com/jpmoore/27-racist-and-homophobic-reactions-to-black-hockey

It’s a horrifying link.  The comments section is worse but there is some commonsense in there too.
—–

Widow receives accidental-death benefits in auto-erotic electrocution case

Court stuns insurer in death claim

This is clearly the best headline of the week.  Also, fascinating from a legal perspective.
—-

Purity ring just released a new track, good stuff http://purityringsongs.com/

1914 pic of the Brooklyn bridge while it was under construction.

Posted in Quick Thoughts | Leave a comment

Man of Letters: Ernest Hemingway

Reading the classics of 20th century literature is often an enriching and illuminating experience.  Every so often it is a dreadful waste of time, which is how I feel about all of Ernest Hemingway’s books.   In the December 24, 1927 issue of The New Yorker James Thurber dropped this cunning bit of satire designed to show what it would look like if Hemingway had written Twas the Night Before Christmas by Clement Clark Moore

It was the night before Christmas. The house was very quiet. No creatures were stirring in the house. There weren’t even any mice stirring. The stockings had been hung carefully by the chimney. The children hoped that Saint Nicholas would come and fill them.

The children were in their beds. Their beds were in the room next to ours. Mamma and I were in our beds. Mamma wore a kerchief. I had my cap on. I could hear the children moving. We didn’t move. We wanted the children to think we were asleep.
“Father,” the children said.

There was no answer. He’s there, all right, they thought.

“Father,” they said, and banged on their beds.

“What do you want?” I asked.

“We have visions of sugarplums,” the children said.

“Go to sleep,” said mamma.

“We can’t sleep,” said the children. They stopped talking, but I could hear them moving. They made sounds.

“Can you sleep?” asked the children.

“No,” I said.

“You ought to sleep.”

“I know. I ought to sleep.”

“Can we have some sugarplums?”

“You can’t have any sugarplums,” said mamma.

“We just asked you.”

There was a long silence. I could hear the children moving again.

Out on the lawn a clatter arose. I got out of bed and went to the window. I opened the shutters; then I threw up the sash. The moon shone on the snow. The moon gave the lustre of mid-day to objects in the snow. There was a miniature sleigh in the snow, and eight tiny reindeer. A little man was driving them. He was lively and quick. He whistled and shouted at the reindeer and called them by their names. Their names were Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen, Comet, Cupid, Donder, and Blitzen.

Compare this to

‘Twas the night before Christmas, when all thro’ the house
Not a creature was stirring, not even a mouse;
The stockings were hung by the chimney with care,
In hopes that St. Nicholas soon would be there;
The children were nestled all snug in their beds,
While visions of sugar plums danc’d in their heads,

And Mama in her ‘kerchief, and I in my cap,
Had just settled our brains for a long winter’s nap —
When out on the lawn there arose such a clatter,
I sprang from the bed to see what was the matter.
Away to the window I flew like a flash,
Tore open the shutters, and threw up the sash.
The moon on the breast of the new fallen snow,
Gave the luster of mid-day to objects below;

When, what to my wondering eyes should appear,
But a miniature sleigh, and eight tiny reindeer,
With a little old driver, so lively and quick,
I knew in a moment it must be St. Nick.
More rapid than eagles his coursers they came,
And he whistled, and shouted, and call’d them by name:
“Now! Dasher, now! Dancer, now! Prancer and Vixen,
“On! Comet, on! Cupid, on! Donder and Blitzen;

What the hell kind of name is “Donder?”

Posted in Voodoo Book Club | 1 Comment

Ze Frank is BACK!!

One of my favorite things from the mid-oughts has made a glorious resurgence, THE SHOW w Ze Frank is now, A SHOW w Ze Frank.  And it’s on youtube!

It’s like hanging out with a smart, quirky, somewhat unfocused friend who doesn’t sleep enough.

Posted in My Advice To You, Nubs Up | Leave a comment

Game Show Theory – Golden Balls

Definitely worth watching this

 

:: via email (Thanks Noah!) ::

Posted in Nubs Up | Leave a comment

Anti-Quote of the Day: Jane Goodall

Unlimited economic progress in a world of finite resources is bound to collapse. - Jane Goodall @1:17

When you hear someone say something like this it should be a key indication that they have not the slightest idea what they are talking about.  Frustratingly it is an oft repeated sentiment among environmentalists and amateur economists.  It’s in the same category as ”Capitalism is invalid because it relies on unlimited economic growth.” Both of these are spectacularly wrong for several reasons.  My friend Eric put it most succinctly:

…economic progress isn’t bound by natural resources. If someone figures out a way to do something more efficiently, that’s economic progress that may in fact reduce the natural resources required.

Eric hit the nail on the head, I tend to break this down in a longer form.

Obviously resources are finite, that’s a truism and kind of meaningless :-/  The question is how limited are they? What is our resource ceiling?  Are we talking all the titanium in the milky way galaxy or all the different ways we can create polymers that replace metals?  What about using LEDs to vastly improve the amount of food we can grow?  Are trees a finite natural resource?  Maybe not if you can replant them forever.  It’s debatable and hence my point.

Even if the resource ceiling is low (unlikely), there might be a near infinite way to combine, use, and reuse those resources.  In that case, unlimited economic progress is certainly possible.  Does that mean that we actually do have infinite resources?   Further complicating this is that economic progress (defined in a broad variety of ways) is based almost entirely on ideas, which are as near to infinite as anything.  Zynga is a multibillion dollar company because people buy virtual carrots.

There is no evidence to suggest a social collapse, short of a catastrophic meteor strike.  It’s a common goal that everyone wants to prevent and there are no indications that it will occur.  In fact, the trend is in the opposite direction.  The makers of Surviving Progress offer an exploding building as evidence/support for their assertion but fail to explain why.   I even think that serious pre-industrial regression is so unlikely that’s it’s not worth considering.  As a species we’re doing fairly well on the millenium development goals
(lots of room for improvement though!).  scope the graphs at the bottom of this wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millennium_Development_Goals

When I look at the statement “unlimited economic progress in a world of finite natural resources is bound  to collapse” I see a super messy, poorly defined equation with an unlikely outcome.  I hang out with a lot of environmentalist hippy types and people say some variant of this to me all time.  It’s a sign that someone hasn’t really thought about what they are saying.   But it is a highly manipulative statement and I bet it’s followed by someone, especially these filmmakers, trying to get me to do something.

HAPPY EARTH DAY!!!

>>>> See Also >>>>
The Policy Economics of Getting Punched Right in The Goddamned Face

Also, if you haven’t seen it already James Cameron and Google are trying to bring an asteroid into orbit around earth by 2025.  It’s blowing by mind.

Posted in Nubs Down, Quote of the Day | 1 Comment

Quote of the Day: Bill Gates

Gates: Women Key to Saudi Arabia Economy

How did the audience react? “One side loved it,” Gates quipped

Gates certainly zinged them with that witty economics talk!   I wonder if anyone mentioned the rampant sexism that keeps women out of his own industry?   OHHH SNAP!!!!

 

Posted in America, Nubs Up, Overheard, Quote of the Day | Leave a comment

Quick Thoughts: Ahead of the Game

I neither smoke weed nor eat meat but I still realize that putting a dispensary inside of an In and Out is one of the best business opportunities out there.

Forbes gets in on the action with

Let’s Be Blunt: It’s Time to End the Drug War

 Should drugs—especially marijuana—be legal? The answer is “yes.” Immediately. Without hesitation. Do not pass Go. Do not collect $200 seized in a civil asset forfeiture.

The above perhaps being one of the single most amazingly tortured metaphors in the history of drug journalism.  Every article I read about marijuana makes me think of this brilliant Onion video.

 

Marijuana legalization is now definitely a matter of when not if.  Also Rob Kampia is all:

Top drug reformer: ‘Obama is worse than Bush’ on marijuana policy

Which I think is actually not true.  The DEA under Obama has gone after dispensaries but I don’t think has imprisoned people at the same rate or duration.  Jus’ sayin’

Posted in America, Cops are Still Fucked Up, Culture Jamming, Duh, Politricks | Leave a comment

Quote of the Day: Plato

“One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors.”  -Plato

The government’s endless wartime footing is also seen in its war on whistleblowers. Obama has continued cases brought by Bush, such as going after the “leaker” in the warrantless wiretapping story broken by the New York Times in 2005, as well as the WikiLeaks case, prosecution of Bradley Manning, and others for allegedly mishandling classified materials related to the war on terrorism. Its suppression of war-related information given to journalists extends overseas, where the State Department this month has blocked a visa for aPakistani critic from speaking in the U.S. The White House also recentlypressured Yemen’s leader to jail the reporter who exposed U.S. drone strikes. Meanwhile, the administration has stonewalled Freedom of Information Act requests, particularly the Justice Department, which has issued the secret wartime memos.

:: How Obama Became a Civil Libertarian’s Nightmare via Alternet ::

look at how smoothly I integrated cat gif friday

Posted in Politricks | Leave a comment

Big Brother Data Rates

Earlier this week the American Civil Liberties Union revealed a trove of documents it had obtained through Freedom of Information Requests to more than 200 police departments around the country. They show a pattern of police tracking cell phone locations and gathering other data like call logs without warrants, using devices that impersonate cell towers to intercept cellular signals, and encouraging officers to refrain from speaking about cell-tracking technology to the public, all detailed in a New York Times story.

But at least one document also details the day-to-day business of telecoms’ handing over of data to law enforcement, including a breakdown of every major carrier’s fees for every sort of data request from targeted wiretaps to so-called “tower dumps” that provide information on every user of certain cell tower. The guide, as provided by the Tucson, Arizona police department to the ACLU, is dated July 2009, and the fees it lists may be somewhat outdated. But representatives I reached by email at Verizon and AT&T both declined to detail any changes to the numbers.

Here are a few of the highlights from the fee data.

  • Wiretaps cost hundreds of dollars per target every month, generally paid at daily or monthly rates. To wiretap a customer’s phone, T-Mobile charges law enforcement a flat fee of $500 per target. Sprint’s wireless carrier Sprint Nextel requires police pay $400 per “market area” and per “technology” as well as a $10 per day fee, capped at $2,000. AT&T charges a $325 activation fee, plus $5 per day for data and $10 for audio. Verizon charges a $50 administrative fee plus $700 per month, per target.
  • Data requests for voicemail or text messages cost extra. AT&T demands $150 for access to a target’s voicemail, while Verizon charges $50 for access to text messages. Sprint offers the most detailed breakdown of fees for various kinds of data on a phone, asking $120 for pictures or video, $60 for email, $60 for voice mail and $30 for text messages.

 

:: Price Breakdown via Forbes ::

A couple things here: first, these powers were justified because of the war on terrorism but have overwhelmingly been used as part of the war on drugs.  Second, the Summit of the Americas is coming up and it appears that the vast majority of American countries are in favor of a debate on legalization.  However the Obama administration has signaled that it’s not even interested in the discussion.   I found this interesting:

Cesar Gaviria, a former Colombian president who has been a forceful critic of the U.S. policy, said American officials acknowledge the failure of the policy behind closed doors and do little to defend it publicly. He said it is simply a policy on automatic pilot.

“You reach the conclusion that all this killing in Mexico and Central America has been in the name of a failed policy that the United States does not believe in or vigorously defend,” said Gaviria, speaking in his Bogota office.

:: Latin Alternatives via WaPo (Thanks Melissa!) ::

AND speaking of droids, since everyone knows that Star Wars is extremely awesome…you should definitely check out a small comic book arc that just concluded called Agent of the Empire: Iron Eclipse.   It’s about a secret agent for the empire’s intelligence service named Jahan Cross.  Think James Bond x Star Wars.   There are 5 comics and you can buy them through iTunes here or amazon here.  If you’ve never checked out any Star Wars comics you can preview it here.  Comic books on a computer typically  use .cbr files which are basically just a collection of jpegs but you need a special reader for it.  On a mac, I use FFview.  Agent for the Empire is definitely worth checking out.

 

Posted in America, Incompetence, Politricks | Leave a comment

Complex Humor

See also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet,_nobody_knows_you’re_a_dog

Posted in Hilarity Ensues | Leave a comment