From the USA Today

From the USA Today::

Thomas Drake, William Binney and J. Kirk Wiebe belong to a select fraternity: the NSA officials who paved the way.

For years, the three whistle-blowers had told anyone who would listen that the NSA collects huge swaths of communications data from U.S. citizens. They had spent decades in the top ranks of the agency, designing and managing the very data-collection systems they say have been turned against Americans. When they became convinced that fundamental constitutional rights were being violated, they complained first to their superiors, then to federal investigators, congressional oversight committees and, finally, to the news media.

To the intelligence community, the trio are villains who compromised what the government classifies as some of its most secret, crucial and successful initiatives. They have been investigated as criminals and forced to give up careers, reputations and friendships built over a lifetime.

Today, they feel vindicated.

They say the documents leaked by Edward Snowden, the 29-year-old former NSA contractor who worked as a systems administrator, proves their claims of sweeping government surveillance of millions of Americans not suspected of any wrongdoing.
::: 3 NSA Whistleblowers Speak Out: We Told You So :::

—-

The take home message here is that if you notice something is wrong don’t complain to the people who would look bad if it gets revealed.  Just leak the documents and let the public decide.

 

tumblr_inline_moe2fgJqEc1qz4rgp

Citizens Unite!

from The Economist:::

Many feared that social media would undermine professional reporting. Defensive journalists derided it. “I would trust citizen journalism as much as I would trust citizen surgery,” quipped Morley Safer, a CBS correspondent. As it turns out, photographs, videos and tweets from ordinary people are improving and expanding news coverage. They also create work for journalists who know how to curate, authenticate and analyse their material

:: Amateur Journalists Create Jobs for Professional Ones ::

This may seem like a tired and somewhat obvious idea now but a few years ago it was a widely derided notion that democratizing media was a good thing.  In fact, the consensus (mostly among journalists) was that the internet would destroy all media organizations, destroy the nature of journalism and reporting, and leave Americans to become fuckwits.  I bet I’ve been to like 20 different panels on why journalism is dying or that involved desperate pleas for new business models.

tumblr_mnmpga5PPU1r4zr2vo1_500

Excerpt: An Idiots Guide to Free Speech

from: An Idiots Guide to Free Speech in Jezebel

The First Amendment does not protect you from:

  • Criticism: If you’re a comedian who makes a bad rape joke, people are allowed to point out that you’re not funny as well as an asshole.
  • Shame: If you tweet something racist about President Obama on your public Twitter account that’s connected to your first and last name, people are allowed to say that is bad.
  • The Right to Anonymity: If you take creepy photos of women without their consent and post them on Reddit, people are allowed to try and figure out who you are and post your information on the internet. No one is entitled to anonymity. It’s up to you whether to make it easy for people to find you.
  • Mockery: Hi, PIKE brothers. Did you deserve to be mocked for your cheesy PG-13 photos? It doesn’t matter. You put yourselves out there, which means your peers (and news outlets) have the right to LOL and comment.
  • Consequences: If you publicly express yourself in a manner that is offensive, hurtful, or just plain dumb, strangers might contact your friends/family/school/employer and tell them what you did. That is not infringing on your right to free speech; it’s pointing out how you choose to exercise that right. Like the rest of the federal constitution, the First Amendment protects us from the government, not from private companies, which may be able to fire or otherwise punish you for stuff you say, even if it’s outside of work. The laws protecting the free speech of private employees vary from state to state, aside from specifically protected speech like labor organizing. Here are some guidelines forpublic employees and students.

——

I was reading this as a result of exploring the debate between Jim Norton and Lindy West on rape jokes in comedy.  Lindy West wrote an excellent piece on How to Make A Rape Joke.  (Easy shortcut: DO NOT MAKE RAPE VICTIMS THE BUTT OF THE JOKE. Basically, effective rape jokes only work if they make fun of society/oppressors, not the oppressed.”)

4c5ed52d8a5ca83506cb84a3deadaa0ec7ec7825_m

Man of Letters: Reading Rainbow

On China by Henry Kissinger 
It’s truly a testament to American exceptionalism when a bonafide war criminal like Henry Kissinger can walk freely about society, let alone publish a best-selling book. On China chronicles his bureaucratic adventures as the first diplomat to reconnect politically with Maoist China. The first third of the book is a highly engaging political and social history of China which is the part that I heartily recommend. The rest is just incredibly boring accounts of the stultifying bureaucracy involved in international diplomacy.  I can’t even imagine how mindnumbing the actual experience was if this is the “book version” of events. This is the part that makes me realize I would have been miserable if I had ever become a diplomat.  this was very cool to read in Beijing, Hong Kong and Shanghai. the last third is terribly boring.  You also have to endure Kissinger’s acute pomposity throughout, although it’s hard to criticize him too much on that front because he was actually there.  There is also no escaping the feeling that this book is almost a weird double feint that is actually written for a chinese readership.
One time I saw Henry Kissinger at cocktail party at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government.  My plan was to walk up to him, sock him in the nose as hard as I could, yell THAT WAS FOR CAMBODIA! and then dash out of the room.  The assault charges would have been worth it (if I had been caught) but I didn’t want to lose my fellowship at the law school.
henry_kissinger_on_china:: Amazon :: Nubs Up, but you don’t need to finish it.

Beloved by Toni Morrison
I had to give up on this book after 40 pages. You could say that it has a non-linear plot line or that it’s simply badly written (Sorry Dana!).  The former seems like a hard sell given that it won the nobel prize in literature.  For me, it was aesthetically unpleasant and I was never able to get a grounding in the world that Morrison weaves because of seemingly random shifts in narrative voice.  Sometimes with no warning from sentence to sentence which is partially due to pomo time jumps that dissolve the entire plotline.  I can concede such things are sometimes necessary but it appears the book is polarizing because it never stops.  It was #19 on the Readers List of the best books of the 20th century.  I have crossed it off the list.
toni-morrison-beloved

:: Amazon :: Nubs Down, but some people I respect like it.

All of the Sookie Stackhouse Southern Vampire Mysteries by Charlaine Harris
I just finished the 13th book in the Sookie Stackhouse series. All of the books are delightful easy reads but they peter out as the author shows she can’t get away from her previously winning formula over and over again.  The 13th book was the last in the series and I really wish I had waited until now to read all of them because I think I lost a lot in the years in between when books were published.  Reading the reviews of these books on amazon is a tedious slog through what it must be like to be a beloved author.  People are very angry about this book. Angry in a frothing, irrational way that bespeaks how emotionally attached they got to the first books which is sort of a massive endorsement in its own way.  I didn’t think the ending was amazing but I’m not crazy enough to write a huge insane review on amazon.  I don’t think this book is as compelling as it’s predecessors but I don’t care all that much because it’s just candy.
51+ebrLIAIL:: Amazon & reviews :: Nubs up, with southern charm!

The Magnificent Ambersons by Booth Tarkington
This was delightful and I was halfway through it when my backpack (with kindle inside) was stolen in Beijing. Apparently, it’s a pretty good Orson Welles film too.   #100 on the hundred best books of the century list.
magnificent-ambersons-booth-tarkington-paperback-cover-art

:: Amazon :: Nubs up, of what I read.

It Worked For Me by Colin Powell 
I skimmed this but it was folksy and enjoyable with nothing that could really offend anyone.  There is no policy analysis and the diplomacy parts are mostly about the great presents that you get from foreign leaders. I like to read biographies of accomplished people who are sharing their techniques.  It was also kind of an advertisement for Powell’s highly touted speaking engagements.  I feel like there were a few genuine nuggets of wisdom in the book but I don’t really remember them.  The whole thing felt like a long article from the Sunday magazine insert of USA Today.
51FXg6-S45L
:: Amazon :: Nubs up, I guess

Orange Sunshine by Nicolas Schou
This is pretty much a history of the surfer bullies turned acid heads that imported so much hash from Afghanistan that the DEA was created.  This is also kind of a history of post millbrook, post harvard Timothy Leary.  It reads like a very long newspaper article and isn’t really held in place by a consistent narrative or core characters.  It’s entertaining though.  I only read it because I met this guy who helped break Timothy Leary out of jail and he said the book was bullshit. Also, Leary later turned that guy into the cops and he ended up doing five years in jail while Leary went free.  What an asshole.
61VHsbWVfbL:: Amazon :: Nubs up, but only if you’re into that sort of thing

Earth Unaware (Enders Game Prequel) by Orson Scott Card
When I was getting hyped on the previews of Enders Game I started digging around. OSC released a new prequel to Enders Game called Earth Unaware.  It slipped by my notice (probably because it was greeted by little fanfare and very poor reviews).  Human beings are strange because they want something new that hews to the same formula that they loved before.  A lot of reviewers were angry that this wasn’t enders game.  Also, there were some nitpicks from armchair physicists which I didn’t think were inconsistent with any other science fiction.  Mostly people were angry that this wasn’t another Ender’s Game which is interesting because even the sequels to Enders Game were not another Enders Game.  This is a book about love, struggle and family.
13151129:: Amazon :: Nubs Up, I enjoyed it but wouldn’t necessarily recommend it. The sequel is here and comes out june 4th

Enders Shadow, Shadow of the Hegemon by Orson Scott Card
Reading earth unaware made me want to reread Ender’s Shadow, which is amazing. Definitely as good as Ender’s Game. Then I wanted more and decided to read Shadow of the hegemon was an attempt at a political thriller that fell flat.

 

Movie: Lord of War

I forget who exactly told me to watch Lord of War but I finally did it on a flight from SF to Houston.  Excellent cinematography and a pretty potent point that I think is probably lost on most people (as satire often is).  However, I’ll never be able to take Nicolas Cage seriously.

e50bf1ea8bbfb2d853e3843341fb608e

An Army Air Corps Door Gunner onboard a Lynx Mk9A helicopter with 672 Squadron in Afghanistan, is pictured looking through the sights of a Heavy Machine Gun (HMG).

 

 

 

 

 

Quick Thoughts: Attraction and Sexy Advertising

It’s interesting that so much time is spent in pursuit of beauty when that doesn’t necessarily correlate to how good someone is in bed.  This obviously isn’t profound but it does help me to resist the allure of sex based advertising.  When I’m being confronted with a dazzling photoshopped image luring me into some sort of mindless consumer interaction it’s nice to remember the person in question is probably only average to have sex with.

Speaking of which, I would really like to have sex in an antechoic chamber

News Roundup: Sloth Edition

This is a video from AfrikaBurn (burning man in africa) that is quite compelling.  I have the music on repeat.  (via Brad)

Ex-African Dictator Mobuto Sese Seku has a smart and engaging piece on the things internet people are saying about Angelina Jolie’s breasts. Best of all, it’s smug, hilarious and makes fun of people who don’t “get it.” (via Sidney)

I think it’s interesting that a guy who is trying to throw parties (PARTIES!) is going to jail for a decade when a lot of the sketchy wall st people responsible for a massive recession haven’t even seen a trial. (via Alex)

This is a very well written, reasoned and supported article on the resurgence of Ketamine to treat depression. This is not directly relevant to me as I have zero interest in ketamine as a recreational drug and don’t have anything near depression but I still think it’s worth knowing about. Ketamine is schedule III and off label drug usage in the service of saving your life is generally accepted as ethical. If you’re in that place you should know this is an option. (via Josh)

This is a picture of wedding rings pulled off of people at Auschwitz that has been kind of making me a sick to my stomach all day.
zTQJt2J

Switching gears, this Werner Herzog clip on the Obscenity of the Jungle is still one of the funniest goddamn things on the entire internet.

Finally, a very cute sloth. (via Chloe)
Es9Bmgy

Psychiatric Drug Innovation In Crisis

“The interest in psychedelics may also have something to do with a growing sense of frustration over the lack of promising new psychiatric drugs in the pipeline. Many of the current drugs are based on compounds discovered serendipitously in the 1950s, and true innovation has been so hard to come by that many companies are giving up.”

:: Wired covers the MAPS Conference ::

tumblr_mkkbdyxcbT1r3y74po3_400

 

BONUS QUOTE

“Psychedelic scientists still face obstacles at every step of the process, from getting research funding, to getting the compounds themselves, to publishing the findings, says psychiatrist David Nutt of Imperial College London. Nutt recently won a large grant from the British government to conduct a clinical trial of psilocybin for depression. But red tape is holding it up.

To comply with the law, Nutt has to find a manufacturer who’s capable of making medical-grade psilocybin and has all the proper permits to make controlled substances. So far, he hasn’t found one. The study is on hold.

“The illegality of these drugs has profoundly distorted research and continues to do so,” Nutt said at the conference. “It’s one of the greatest scandals in modern research.”

—-

I’d say that not publishing negative data is a substantially bigger scandal but this is certainly something that should be of concern to people with depression.