Man of Letters: Lolita by Vladimir Nabokov

The purpose of this post is not so much to write my own review of the book (I read it many years ago and I’m left mostly with a fierce impression of quality) but instead to build out a more coherent link structure from my too longstanding goal to read all of the Modern Library novels.  You can see my progress at Herein, I Attempt to Become a Man of Letters.

Lolita is one of best books I’ve ever read not in terms of the content but in terms of prose.  No reasonable person could read the book and not commit a few lines to memory.  I even named a playlist after one of my favorite lines: She moved like a fair angel among horrible boschian cripples.

However, the thing which I would very much like to draw your attention to is this review of the book by Christopher Hitchens, which is absolutely spectacular.  I strongly recommend it.

The wikipedia article is also worth pursuing.  If you’re into it these are 185 covers of Lolita over 37 countries and 56 years.

url

Quick Thoughts: Rainy Season

All jackets should have a pocket big enough to fit a kindle.

- I finished reading the Wheel of Time Book 1 – The Eye of the World.
It was good and addictive but other times is was dreadfully slow.  I like fiction that has a spectacular story (check!) but also says something about the world at large (not so much).  Aside from some potshots at fundamentalist religions and fantastic prose, I’m not sure I learned anything from it.  The Krugster just wrote a new introduction for the Foundation Series and he blurbs wheel of time:

This unique plot structure creates an ironic resonance between the ‘Foundation’ novels and a seemingly unrelated genre, what I’d call prophetic fantasy. These are novels – Robert Jordan’s ‘Wheel of Time’ cycle comes to mind – in which the protagonists have a mystical destiny, foreshadowed in visions and ancient writings, and the unfolding of the plot tells of their march toward that destiny. Actually, I’m a sucker for that kind of fiction, which makes for great escapism precisely because real life is nothing like that. The first half of the ‘Foundation’ series manages, however, to have the structure of prophecy and destiny without the mysticism; it’s all about the laws of psychohistory, you see, and Hari Seldon’s prescience comes from his mathematics.

:: Conscience of a Krugster via the NYTimes ::

- I got about half way through Decision Points – The Autobiography of George W. Bush before I gave up.  One is given the distinct impression that Bush is a great man with an uncommon vision and leadership skills mercilessly set upon by a duplicitous media for no reason whatsoever.  It’s somehow tragic the way in which he is deeply frustrated and personally hurt that no one else realizes that his administration was an unmitigated success.  I found it strange to read because it jumps around in time with no warning, one sentence he’s talking about the 70s the next he’s talking about being bombarded by pardon requests at the end of his term.  Sometimes the changes are thematically related, other times they appear to be completely random free associations.  The book dispelled a few myths that I believed about Bush but made me realize some things were far worse than I knew.  For instance, I had long believed that Bush’s Texas cowboy persona was a deftly calculated act by an east coast upper crust ivy leaguer.  It turns out that aside from college and boarding school he spent his whole life in Texas.  He is a man who is routinely portrayed as possessing this shoot first, ask questions later cowboy swagger.  That’s not the right description.  Cowboy has a lot of hero connotation in popular culture, it’s more accurate to say that he is an arrogant fratboy.  I was amazed by how open he was about binge drinking, drinking and driving, hard partying and just generally fucking around with his life.  What hit me was how lucky the country is that Bush at least surrounded himself with intelligent people.  After hearing about the 9/11 attacks he actually demanded to fly back to the whitehouse to show that he wasn’t afraid of an entirely unknown assault.  The secret service wouldn’t let him.   He also refers to Clarence Thomas as a wise, principled and humble man which blew my mind.

- I am currently reading The Nine: The Secret World of the Supreme Court By Jeffrey Toobin.  It seems more like a long magazine article than a book.  Interesting perspective on Sandra Day O’Connor was one of the most important jurists of the century. I will probably read The Oath: The Obama Whitehouse and the Supreme Court by Jeffrey Toobin next.

Little Baby’s Ice Cream Shop In Philadelphia Releases Terrifying Commercial

Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad [Man of Letters]

As part of my ongoing quest to become a man of letters I just finished  #67 on the Modern Library’s 100 Best Books of the Century.  Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad is a stunning look into racism and colonialism in turn of the 20th century Africa.  At once visceral and rich, the entire book is permeated with a psychological tension that exposes empire and raw avarice.  It’s short and will almost certainly be even better upon rereading.

The book is a fictional account of a brutal operation by the Congo Free State which was a  private colonial operation by King Leopold II.

The Congo Free State was a large area in CentralAfrica which was privately controlled by Leopold II, King of the Belgians. Its origins lay in Leopold’s attracting scientific, and humanitarian backing for a non-governmental organization, the Association internationale africaine. Using first the multi-national AIA, then the “Committee for Studies of the Upper Congo” (FrenchComité d’études du Haut-Congo), and finally the International Association of the Congo (FrenchAssociation internationale du Congo), Leopold secured control of most of the Congo basin. Unlike the multinational AIA, the AIC was Leopold’s personal vehicle. As the sole shareholder and chairman, he increasingly used it to gather and sell ivory, rubber, and minerals in the upper Congo basin (though it had been set up on the understanding that its purpose was to uplift the local people and develop the area). He gave the AIC the name Congo Free State in 1885. The state included the entire area of the present Democratic Republic of the Congo and existed from 1885 to 1908. The Congo Free State eventually earned infamy due to the increasingly brutal mistreatment of the local peoples and plunder of natural resources, leading to its abolition and annexation by the government of Belgium in 1908.

Under Leopold II’s administration, the Congo Free State became one of the greatest international scandals of the early twentieth century. The reportof the British Consul Roger Casement led to the arrest and punishment of white officials who had been responsible for killings during a rubber-collecting expedition in 1903 (including one Belgian national for causing the shooting of at least 122 Congolese people).[citation needed]

The loss of life and atrocities inspired literature such as Joseph Conrad‘s Heart of Darkness, and raised outcries, even from such upholders of the colonial mission as Winston Churchill. One view is that the forced labour system directly and indirectly eliminated 20% of the population.[2]

European and U.S. reformers exposed the conditions in the Congo Free State to the public through the Congo Reform Association. Also active in exposing the activities of the Congo Free State was the author Arthur Conan Doyle, whose book The Crime of the Congo was widely read in the early 1900s. By 1908, public pressure and diplomatic manoeuvres led to the end of Leopold II’s rule and to the annexation of the Congo as a colony of Belgium, known as the Belgian Congo.

::: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congo_Free_State :::

 

Leopold II (FrenchLéopold Louis Philippe Marie VictorDutchLeopold Lodewijk Filips Maria Victor) (9 April 1835 – 17 December 1909) was the king of the Belgians. Born in Brussels the second (but eldest surviving) son of Leopold I and Louise-Marie of Orléans, he succeeded his father to the throne on 17 December 1865 and remained king until his death.

Leopold is chiefly remembered as the founder and sole owner of the Congo Free State, a private project undertaken on his own behalf. He used Henry Morton Stanley [of Dr Livingston I presume?] to help him lay claim to the Congo, an area now known as the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The Powers at the Berlin Conference in its final Act in 1885, committed the State to improving the lives of the inhabitants. From the beginning, however, Leopold essentially ignored these conditions and ran the Congo brutally, using a mercenary force, for his own personal gain.

Leopold extracted a fortune from the Congo, initially by the collection of ivory, and after a rise in the price of rubber in the 1890s, by forcing the population to collect sap from rubber plants. Villages were required to meet quotas on rubber collections, and their hands were cut off if they didn’t meet it. His harsh regime was responsible for the death of an estimated five to 15 million Congolese (the indigenous inhabitants of the Congo River basin). The Congo became one of the most infamous international scandals of the early 20th century, and Leopold was ultimately forced to relinquish control of it to the government of Belgium.

:::: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_II_of_Belgium ::::

The book takes place in a small sailboat on the Thames river outside of London.  A group of men are gathered listening to a man tell a story about his trip on a steam ship up the Congo River in Africa.  Heart of darkness uses a Frame Narrative (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_narrative) aka a story within a story.  For all it’s eloquence, this frame narrative is overly ambitious and turns out clunky.  Yet it is one of the critical metaphors in the book.  Sunset and darkening night aboard the boat in the Thames bely the darkening tremor aboard the steamship on the congo river.  The passage of time and the darkening sky during the storyteller’s narrative parallel the atmosphere of the events in the book.

The writing is at times amazing but it’s not consistent and the story doesn’t always quite make sense.  Still, it’s pretty good and it gave me a stronger feeling for how events at the turn of the last century played into colonialism.  I give it a nubs up!

I’ll close with this excerpt from The Congo, a 1914 Poem by Vachal Linsay

Listen to the yell of Leopold’s ghost
Burning in Hell for his hand-maimed host.
Hear how the demons chuckle and yell
Cutting his hands off, down in Hell.

* #44 on Modern Library’s list The World According to Garp uses the frame narrative expertly and to great effect.

Man of Letters: Ernest Hemingway

Reading the classics of 20th century literature is often an enriching and illuminating experience.  Every so often it is a dreadful waste of time, which is how I feel about all of Ernest Hemingway’s books.   In the December 24, 1927 issue of The New Yorker James Thurber dropped this cunning bit of satire designed to show what it would look like if Hemingway had written Twas the Night Before Christmas by Clement Clark Moore

It was the night before Christmas. The house was very quiet. No creatures were stirring in the house. There weren’t even any mice stirring. The stockings had been hung carefully by the chimney. The children hoped that Saint Nicholas would come and fill them.

The children were in their beds. Their beds were in the room next to ours. Mamma and I were in our beds. Mamma wore a kerchief. I had my cap on. I could hear the children moving. We didn’t move. We wanted the children to think we were asleep.
“Father,” the children said.

There was no answer. He’s there, all right, they thought.

“Father,” they said, and banged on their beds.

“What do you want?” I asked.

“We have visions of sugarplums,” the children said.

“Go to sleep,” said mamma.

“We can’t sleep,” said the children. They stopped talking, but I could hear them moving. They made sounds.

“Can you sleep?” asked the children.

“No,” I said.

“You ought to sleep.”

“I know. I ought to sleep.”

“Can we have some sugarplums?”

“You can’t have any sugarplums,” said mamma.

“We just asked you.”

There was a long silence. I could hear the children moving again.

Out on the lawn a clatter arose. I got out of bed and went to the window. I opened the shutters; then I threw up the sash. The moon shone on the snow. The moon gave the lustre of mid-day to objects in the snow. There was a miniature sleigh in the snow, and eight tiny reindeer. A little man was driving them. He was lively and quick. He whistled and shouted at the reindeer and called them by their names. Their names were Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen, Comet, Cupid, Donder, and Blitzen.

Compare this to

‘Twas the night before Christmas, when all thro’ the house
Not a creature was stirring, not even a mouse;
The stockings were hung by the chimney with care,
In hopes that St. Nicholas soon would be there;
The children were nestled all snug in their beds,
While visions of sugar plums danc’d in their heads,

And Mama in her ‘kerchief, and I in my cap,
Had just settled our brains for a long winter’s nap —
When out on the lawn there arose such a clatter,
I sprang from the bed to see what was the matter.
Away to the window I flew like a flash,
Tore open the shutters, and threw up the sash.
The moon on the breast of the new fallen snow,
Gave the luster of mid-day to objects below;

When, what to my wondering eyes should appear,
But a miniature sleigh, and eight tiny reindeer,
With a little old driver, so lively and quick,
I knew in a moment it must be St. Nick.
More rapid than eagles his coursers they came,
And he whistled, and shouted, and call’d them by name:
“Now! Dasher, now! Dancer, now! Prancer and Vixen,
“On! Comet, on! Cupid, on! Donder and Blitzen;

What the hell kind of name is “Donder?”

Man of Letters: Brideshead Revisited

As part of my ongoing project to Become a Man of Letters I recently completed Brideshead Revisited by Evelyn Waugh.  Completed is tricky sleight of hand because I got fed up with it languishing on my shelf half finished.  I decided to stop procrastinating and just declare that I wasn’t interested enough to complete it.  I sauntered through the first third, read the second in a single sitting and couldn’t bring myself to sag through the last.

First, Evelyn is also a mans name, at least in England.  That’s the first surprise here.  The second surprise is finding out that the entire book is mostly a winding justification for Waughs conversion to Catholicism.  My lifetime has seen the precipitous decline of the church and I don’t personally find suffering as a means towards the divine a very compelling topic.  Less compelling is the argument that Waugh puts forth.  I, like many, actually found that Catholicism made almost all the characters in the novel miserable.  From alcoholism to bullshit marriages to unrequited manlove to last minute quasi-redemptions, the novel was a slow burn shit show that, likely against the authors intention, illustrates the utter failings of Catholicism both as a spiritual path and a social force.

Brideshead Revisited is a book of astonishing prose with truly amazing observations on life but…not with any consistency.  They are buried in a haltingly paced story about the travails of an upperclass English Catholic family.  If you were a wine snob in the 50s I’m sure the pages of Brideshead Revisited are stuck together.  The books main conflict is the self destructive existential angst that comes from being insanely rich and how to resolve it with faith in Catholicism.  If the book had a twitter tag it would be #AristocracyProblems.  There are a lot of winding monologues about nothing in particular and I think the book could have been redeemed if Waugh had just cut out 100 pages.

Depending on where you’re at, this is either Waughs best book or his worst.    I also think I would be remiss to mention that I was sure this whole book was a treatise on the main character’s battle with repressed homosexuality.  Sebastian, the friend of the main character is gay (without it being directly stated), and the whole book seemed to me to be about their unrequited love.  I was super surprised that never really got resolved and was just kind of swept under the table.

Thanks to Jefferey for letting me borrow a copy on our adventure in Arizona. 

 

Quick Review: The Hunger Games

I read The Hunger Games about 8 months ago and wasn’t terribly impressed.

Cons:
- Hunger Games is the American Gladiators of dystopian nightmare novels.  Just in case you forgot, American Gladiators is a horrible show that lacks even the finesse of WWF.
- Seriously, why would anyone make children fight each other?  It’s absurd, but that’s a setup that would appeal to the young adults after which the book was fashioned.
- The tension in the novel comes from a ham-handed plot device which ultimately makes no sense and cheapens the whole thing. Rather than warning us against the excesses of power it’s just an insane and ridiculously contrived tale.
- Poor writing.

Pros:
- Extremely visceral.  I found myself paranoid and ready to kill at the drop of a hat with whatever I could fashion in my immediate vicinity.  Does that mean the writing is good?  In terms of prose, hell no.  In terms of feel, mayhap.
- It is a “page turner”
- Powerful female protagonist

The Hunger Games: sorry if you liked it, but nubs down

 

6 Word Sentences: Earnest Hemingway

“For Sale: baby shoes, never worn.”

Hemingway purportedly claims it was his best work….

hemingwayTake that you stupid can!

Except he never probably claimed it was his best work because there is no evidence he even wrote it. The idea probably originated in a play about him from the nineties.

Incidentally, I severely detested Farewell to Arms and being forced to read old man and the sea was one of my worst high school experiences. Earnest Hemingway – Nubs down!

Falling Under the Pressure of the Zeitgeist, I Review Twilight (the book)

Twilight is vaguely enjoyable for reasons I have yet to comprehend despite being totally unhindered by literary merit. In the same vacant way that eat pray love plays on the stereotypically crude fantasies of lovelorn middle-aged women, twilight is a candy gush of achingly predictable teenie bopper high school naivete. It’s replete with crass ideas about love that hinder society’s collective understanding about realistic human relationships. The parts of characters that aren’t nebulously defined are bland enough to prevent much meaningful exposition. The crazy part is just how long the books are in comparison to how little plot actually occurs. Yet, there is no question that I will rapidly finish the third book and start the fourth within the next few hours. I plan on reading gravity’s rainbow to compensate for whatever brain space this uses up.

Before this, Wildcard & Neil convinced me to read Einsteins Dreams which didn’t blow my mind per se but definitely doled out poetic elucidations at a delightfully reliable rate.

Star Wars Slut

OMG! Animated star wars movie comes out in August!!!!!….!!!!!!!!!

Preview! :: Producer Nerd Guy Talking About Series! (includes anakins padawan!!)

I’d also like to take this opportunity to recommend the Revenge of the Sith Novelization by Matthew Stover. You can buy it on amazon for 1 freaking penny! “Outstanding” and “Better than the movie” come up a lot in the amazon reviews. There’s probably an obvious response in saying that besting a piece of shit movie is not exactly a literary feat. However, I believe the book is a masterfully written piece of science fiction in it’s own rite. Here’s my contentious perspective: Episode 3 actually has a plot, it’s just so big and unexplained that most people don’t know it’s there.

Here’s a relevant review that mirrors my own opinions:

Once freed of a film’s running time Stover could really take his time fleshing out issues that the movie was forced to speed through. For example, he made it clear as day why tension had mounted between the Jedi and Palpatine, and the current political climate on Courasant.

The relationship between Anakin and Palpatine is explored much more then in the movie. In the scene when Palpatine revealed himself to Anakin, Palpatine’s emphasis on his right to live and his prediction that the Jedi would kill him on the spot for his religious beliefs, I found, much more effective then in the film. From what I recall, the film focused more on trying to save Amadala from her predicted demise.

I thought that the effect Anakin’s visions were having on him were much better explained then in the movie. The novel, basically, had Anakin terrified to rest and exhausted from sleep depravation. This worked in that when the climatic battle between Windu and Palpatine came to a head, Anakin (who, at that point, was nothing short of delerious from exhustion) obviously wasn’t thinking clearly.

I loved the way that the relationship between Anakin and Obi-Wan developed. It was very well illustrated that Anakin was always using Obi-Wan as his emotional anchor and when removed of that, just how easily he could be manipulated by someone Anakin saw as never having lied to him.

The only thing that I wound up dinging the novel for was the Wookies role and Yoda’s escape. It’s virtually missing, as if someone just accidentally edited it out. It was really bizarre that it was just … not there.

Outstanding book though, as much as I liked the film, the book is significantly better.

Here’s the critical difference that I think most people miss in the comparisons between episodes 4,5,6 (universally praised) and e’s 1,2, and 3 (nearly universally hated on). 456 were a self contained storyline. In fact, 4, was a self contained film bc lucas didn’t know if he was going to have enough money to make 5 and 6. Since then Lucas has become a gajillionaire and hundreds of novels, comic books, action figures have emerged to create a universe. Episodes 2,3 seem weird because they AREN”T self contained, they are slices of that universe. Yes, I agree that might have not been the best choice for a film release but once you accept it and eat the media around them a brilliant story comes out. Definitely Check the previews and at least look at the ep3 book.

Greenspan Lets Loose!

In his long-awaited memoir, to be published tomorrow, Greenspan, a Republican whose 18-year tenure as head of the US Federal Reserve was widely admired, will also deliver a stinging critique of President George W Bush’s economic policies. However, it is his view on the motive for the 2003 Iraq invasion that is likely to provoke the most controversy. “I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil,” he says.

:: via times online ::
:: The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World by Alan Greenspan ::
:: I get into it with someone in the comments area on amazon ::

Then on Daily Show Greenspan admits that we don’t have a freemarket! tiiiiiight!

Jon Stewart: Many people are free-market capitalists, and they always talk about free-market capitalism, and that is our economic theory. So why do we have a Fed? Is the free market – wouldn’t the market take care of interest rates and all that? Why do we have someone adjusting the rates if we are a free-market society?

Alan Greenspan: You’re raising a very fundamental question. … You didn’t need central bank when we were on the gold standard, which was back in the nineteenth century. And all of the automatic things occurred because people would buy and sell gold, and the market would do what the Fed does now. But: most everybody in the world by the 1930s decided that the gold standard was strangling the economy. And universally this gold standard was abandoned. But: you need somebody to determine –or some mechanism – how much money is out there, because remember, the amount of money relates to the amount of inflation in the economy. … In any event the more money you have, relative to the amount of goods, the more inflation you have, and that’s not good. So:

Stewart: So we’re not a free market then.

Greenspan: No. No.

Stewart: There’s a visible – there’s a benevolent hand that touches us.

Greenspan: Absolutely. You’re quite correct. To the extent that there is a central bank governing the amount of money in the system, that is not a free market. Most people call it regulation.


via division of labor

Book Review: The Assault on Reason by Al Gore

News Flash: George W. Bush is a shitty president!!!

If you’re not already familiar with this charming nugget of information you might consider reading the Assault on Reason by Al Gore. Although this book would have actually been useful or part of a vibrant public discourse 4-5 years ago but now it’s just relating the obvious without much in the way of solutions.

And actually it’s a pretty blatantly rips off Noam Chomsky’s Media Control Spectacular Achievements in Propaganda. Assault even goes on to mention that it’s ripping chomsky off.

So I’d say just read Media Control by Noam Chomsky, it’s shorter, better written, cheaper, more relevant and actually says something rather than dancing around issues.

:-(

More than half the adults in this country won’t pick up a novel this year, according to the National Endowment for the Arts. Not one. And the rate of decline has almost tripled in the past decade.

::Harry Potter and the Death of Reading via the Washington Post::

There is at least a decent measure of people to be found in the books they adore. When cruising facebook, myspace or tribe or whatever I mentally award negative check marks to people whose only listed literary endeavors are contained in harry potter and dan brown novels. I’m not saying those books aren’t good, but they only scratch the surface of what’s going on in the world. what I’m getting at is that if someone asks you what your favorite book is and you immediately say “DaVinci Code!” you should be deeply embarrassed. And you know, I’m just going to say this because you need to hear it. You’re also probably a dumbass. Luckily this is a situation that can be remedied or at least seriously mitigated in only a couple years.

I think that a lot of people face a legitimate problem in trying to find good books to read, which is fair. If you walk into a bookstore you’ll find an astounding number of shitty books. One thing I’ve discovered is that you can let time test things out a bit. Sure potter might be all the rage now but will people still care in 20 years? who knows. So here I would like to recommend the modern library’s 100 best books of the century.

http://www.randomhouse.com/modernlibrary/100bestnovels.html

If you like harry potter there are some books in that list that are WAAAAAAY better. Significant quantities of them can be purchased for around a dollar each in secondhand stores. sweet.

Fun Fackt: JK Rowling is the only to become a billionaire by writing books.