Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad [Man of Letters]

As part of my ongoing quest to become a man of letters I just finished  #67 on the Modern Library’s 100 Best Books of the Century.  Heart of Darkness by Joseph Conrad is a stunning look into racism and colonialism in turn of the 20th century Africa.  At once visceral and rich, the entire book is permeated with a psychological tension that exposes empire and raw avarice.  It’s short and will almost certainly be even better upon rereading.

The book is a fictional account of a brutal operation by the Congo Free State which was a  private colonial operation by King Leopold II.

The Congo Free State was a large area in CentralAfrica which was privately controlled by Leopold II, King of the Belgians. Its origins lay in Leopold’s attracting scientific, and humanitarian backing for a non-governmental organization, the Association internationale africaine. Using first the multi-national AIA, then the “Committee for Studies of the Upper Congo” (FrenchComité d’études du Haut-Congo), and finally the International Association of the Congo (FrenchAssociation internationale du Congo), Leopold secured control of most of the Congo basin. Unlike the multinational AIA, the AIC was Leopold’s personal vehicle. As the sole shareholder and chairman, he increasingly used it to gather and sell ivory, rubber, and minerals in the upper Congo basin (though it had been set up on the understanding that its purpose was to uplift the local people and develop the area). He gave the AIC the name Congo Free State in 1885. The state included the entire area of the present Democratic Republic of the Congo and existed from 1885 to 1908. The Congo Free State eventually earned infamy due to the increasingly brutal mistreatment of the local peoples and plunder of natural resources, leading to its abolition and annexation by the government of Belgium in 1908.

Under Leopold II’s administration, the Congo Free State became one of the greatest international scandals of the early twentieth century. The reportof the British Consul Roger Casement led to the arrest and punishment of white officials who had been responsible for killings during a rubber-collecting expedition in 1903 (including one Belgian national for causing the shooting of at least 122 Congolese people).[citation needed]

The loss of life and atrocities inspired literature such as Joseph Conrad‘s Heart of Darkness, and raised outcries, even from such upholders of the colonial mission as Winston Churchill. One view is that the forced labour system directly and indirectly eliminated 20% of the population.[2]

European and U.S. reformers exposed the conditions in the Congo Free State to the public through the Congo Reform Association. Also active in exposing the activities of the Congo Free State was the author Arthur Conan Doyle, whose book The Crime of the Congo was widely read in the early 1900s. By 1908, public pressure and diplomatic manoeuvres led to the end of Leopold II’s rule and to the annexation of the Congo as a colony of Belgium, known as the Belgian Congo.

::: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congo_Free_State :::

 

Leopold II (FrenchLéopold Louis Philippe Marie VictorDutchLeopold Lodewijk Filips Maria Victor) (9 April 1835 – 17 December 1909) was the king of the Belgians. Born in Brussels the second (but eldest surviving) son of Leopold I and Louise-Marie of Orléans, he succeeded his father to the throne on 17 December 1865 and remained king until his death.

Leopold is chiefly remembered as the founder and sole owner of the Congo Free State, a private project undertaken on his own behalf. He used Henry Morton Stanley [of Dr Livingston I presume?] to help him lay claim to the Congo, an area now known as the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The Powers at the Berlin Conference in its final Act in 1885, committed the State to improving the lives of the inhabitants. From the beginning, however, Leopold essentially ignored these conditions and ran the Congo brutally, using a mercenary force, for his own personal gain.

Leopold extracted a fortune from the Congo, initially by the collection of ivory, and after a rise in the price of rubber in the 1890s, by forcing the population to collect sap from rubber plants. Villages were required to meet quotas on rubber collections, and their hands were cut off if they didn’t meet it. His harsh regime was responsible for the death of an estimated five to 15 million Congolese (the indigenous inhabitants of the Congo River basin). The Congo became one of the most infamous international scandals of the early 20th century, and Leopold was ultimately forced to relinquish control of it to the government of Belgium.

:::: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_II_of_Belgium ::::

The book takes place in a small sailboat on the Thames river outside of London.  A group of men are gathered listening to a man tell a story about his trip on a steam ship up the Congo River in Africa.  Heart of darkness uses a Frame Narrative (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frame_narrative) aka a story within a story.  For all it’s eloquence, this frame narrative is overly ambitious and turns out clunky.  Yet it is one of the critical metaphors in the book.  Sunset and darkening night aboard the boat in the Thames bely the darkening tremor aboard the steamship on the congo river.  The passage of time and the darkening sky during the storyteller’s narrative parallel the atmosphere of the events in the book.

The writing is at times amazing but it’s not consistent and the story doesn’t always quite make sense.  Still, it’s pretty good and it gave me a stronger feeling for how events at the turn of the last century played into colonialism.  I give it a nubs up!

I’ll close with this excerpt from The Congo, a 1914 Poem by Vachal Linsay

Listen to the yell of Leopold’s ghost
Burning in Hell for his hand-maimed host.
Hear how the demons chuckle and yell
Cutting his hands off, down in Hell.

* #44 on Modern Library’s list The World According to Garp uses the frame narrative expertly and to great effect.

Legally Not Very Sexy

INDIANAPOLIS — A federal judge has upheld an Indiana law banning registered sex offenders from accessing Facebook and other social-networking sites used by children. Judge Tanya Walton Pratt said in an 18-page order Friday that the state has a strong interest in protecting children and that the rest of the Internet remains open to those who have been convicted.

“Social networking, chat rooms, and instant messaging programs have effectively created a ‘virtual playground’ for sexual predators to lurk,” Pratt wrote in the ruling, citing a 2006 report by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children that found that one in seven youths had received online sexual solicitations and that one in three had been exposed to unwanted sexual material online.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Indiana filed the class-action suit on behalf of a man who served three years for child exploitation, along with other sex offenders who are restricted by the ban even though they are no longer on probation. Federal judges have barred similar laws in Nebraska and Louisiana.

Courts have long allowed states to place restrictions on convicted sex offenders who have completed their sentences, controlling where many live and work and requiring them to register with police. The ACLU claimed that Indiana’s social-networking ban was far broader, restricting a wide swath of constitutionally protected activities. The ACLU contended that even though the 2008 law is only intended to protect children from online sexual predators, social media are virtually indispensable and the ban prevents sex offenders from using the Web sites for political, business and religious activities.

:: Federal Judge Bans Sex Offender from Social-Networking ::

This is serious misinterpretation of the point of restricted use.  It might make sense to prohibit a sex offender from visiting a playground because that’s a place explicitly designed for children but it’s entirely different to ban someone from anyplace that children could potentially be.  It’s comparable to banning a sex offender from airports, restaurants, or movie theatres because like Facebook they “don’t prohibit children.” It’s a fucking ridiculous ruling and I suspect that both the lawyers and the judge have no clear understanding of what’s going on.  I suppose a judge could ban a sex offender from seeing G rated films or going to restaurants specifically for children (McDonalds for example) but that’s too fine grained.  Furthermore, if a person is still such a threat to society that being on facebook constitutes a danger they should still be in prison.  Or we should send these people to places that actually help with rehabilitation.

NEXT

A Tampa rape victim can sue the Hillsborough County Sheriff for allowing a jail guard to refuse to give her a prescribed emergency contraception pill because it was against the guard’s religious beliefs, a federal judge ruled.     R.W., whose full name is not disclosed in court records, says she was raped on Jan. 27, 2007. After an examination at Tampa’s Rape Crisis Center, a doctor gave R.W. gave two anti-contraception pills, according to the complaint.     R.W. says she took one pill immediately and held the other to ingest 12 hours later, as directed.     While taking R.W.’s report of the crime, however, a Tampa police officer learned that there was an arrest warrant for R.W. for failure to pay restitution and failure to appear. At the Hillsborough County Jail, staff confiscated her second pill.     R.W. says she requested her second pill the next morning, but jail employee Michele Spinelli refused. “Spinelli told the Plaintiff that she would not give R.W. the pill because it was against Spinelli’s religious beliefs,” the first amended complaint states.

:: Rape Victim Can Sue for Denied Contraception ::

raped, held in jail, denied contraceptives.  wtf.  Note this article only reports that the guard CAN be sued not that WERE sued.

 

Spaaaaaaace

It’s for this reason that Hanson believes it is bad news to discover that habitable planets are more common than we thought. “This means that it was easier to get to where we are than we thought, which suggests that we are more likely to kill ourselves in the future.” Subsequently, he suggests that we should be even more careful to watch for and avoid such disaster scenarios.

I think the best answer to fermi’s paradox is that other species in the universe just haven’t devoted the resources to finding us.  Idle curiosity is the only reason and that’s not something that entities spend a lot of time and energy on.